Trimoji vs Harver

Volume hiring comparison

Trimoji vs Harver: features and pricing

CriteriaTrimojiHarver
Public pricingfrom €200/month annuallyNot publicly published on the pages viewed; requires demo request.
AssessmentSoft skills, Personi, campaigns, reports, and job matching.450+ assessments, predictive matching, behavioral, cognitive, job skills, video interview, reference checking.
CV AnalysisAI CV analysis, scoring, and shortlist prioritization.Automated screening/matching in a volume hiring process.
IntegrationsPartner ATS included depending on plans. See integrationsIntegrations displayed with iCIMS, Greenhouse, Workday, and others.
PositioningOperational recruitment and HR decision-making.Enterprise platform for volume hiring and talent decisioning.

Which tool to choose?

Harver is designed for organizations that recruit at a very large scale with automation, predictive matching, and candidate experience. Trimoji is more direct for an HR team that wants to define a role, analyze CVs, assess soft skills, and produce an explainable shortlist.

Why do recruiters look at Trimoji?

  • Simple to define: one role, one Personi, one reading grid.
  • AI CV: save time on sorting without removing recruiter decision-making.
  • Reports: share an argued shortlist with managers.

ROI: useful even outside of very large volumes

If your need isn't a complete enterprise project, Trimoji allows you to start with a real role: CV, job matching, soft skills assessment campaigns, and reports, with CV credits and degressive purchase based on volume.

Want to test Trimoji matching on a real role?

Request a Trimoji demoSee pricing

Public sources consulted: Harver official pages "Software", "Predictive Assessments", and "Volume Hiring Solution", Trimoji public pages "Pricing", "CV Analysis and Scoring", "Assessment by Trimoji", "Personi", "Assessment Campaigns", and "Integrations". Pricing and features may change; verification recommended before commercial publication.

Top